This study assesses retrospectively the clinical and economic impact o
f gemcitabine monotherapy on the management of inoperable stage III/IV
non-small cell lung cancer in Germany. Based on current methods of cl
inical practice and using the best outcome data available, the costs a
nd benefits of gemcitabine were compared to a dual therapy (ifosfamide
/etoposide). While the two treatments showed broadly equivalent effica
cy in terms of tumour response rate and survival, a cost analysis show
ed the potential for savings with gemcitabine, These largely related t
o hospital hotelling costs, due to the fact that gemcitabine may be gi
ven as an out-patient therapy. Further savings were found in investiga
tive procedures and the management of treatment toxicity. Excluding th
e cost of the chemotherapy, gemcitabine was associated with potential
savings of DM3,026 over two cycles of therapy, which included a 40% de
crease in hospitalization costs and a 54% decrease in the cost of mana
ging adverse events. We conclude that gemcitabine monotherapy could of
fer considerable cost savings while offering the potential for improve
d quality of palliative treatment compared to existing in-patient trea
tments, and it may have a place in shifting care from an in-patient to
an out-patient setting in line with recent health care reforms.