De. Curtis, THE EFFECT OF FEDERALIZATION ON THE DEFENSE FUNCTION, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 543, 1996, pp. 85-96
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Political Science","Social, Sciences, Interdisciplinary
The increasing federalization of crime gives rise to concurrent state
and federal jurisdiction over most crimes. This dual jurisdiction enab
les prosecutors to choose whether to prosecute in state or federal cou
rts. It is generally easier to obtain conviction in federal courts, an
d there is usually a large differential in the possible punishment und
er the different systems, with the federal system often having the har
sher sentencing structure. As a result, prosecutors have enormous powe
r to coerce guilty pleas or to choose the easiest path to conviction a
t trial. This concentration of power is worrisome, especially because
there is at present no coherent policy about which crimes and which cr
iminals should be prosecuted in state courts and which in federal cour
ts. The result is that the prosecutorial advantages are employed rando
mly, with predictable results: wide disparities in sentences for simil
ar offenses committed by like offenders, and marked differences in enf
orcement patterns across jurisdictions.