Dj. Statters et al., USE OF VENTRICULAR PREMATURE COMPLEXES FOR RISK STRATIFICATION AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION IN THE THROMBOLYTIC ERA, The American journal of cardiology, 77(2), 1996, pp. 133-138
The independent predictive role of ventricular premature complex (VPC)
frequency in the stratification of mortality risk after acute myocard
ial infarction (AMI) was established in the prethrombolytic era by ext
ensive multicenter trials. Thrombolysis has lead to important changes
in the natural history of patients after AMI, so that reassessment of
established risk factors is now required. The prognostic significance
of VPCs was assessed in 680 patients, of whom 379 received early throm
bolytic therapy. All patients underwent 24-hour Halter monitoring in a
drug-free state between 6 and 10 days after AMI. Patients were follow
ed vp for 1 to 8 years. During the first year of follow-up, cardiac de
ath occurred in 33 patients, sudden death in 24, and sustained ventric
ular tachycardia in 20. Mean VPC frequency was significantly higher in
patients who died of cardiac causes, in those who died suddenly, and
in those with arrhythmic events during the first year of follow-up. Th
is was also true when patients who did and did not undergo thrombolysi
s were considered separately. The positive predictive accuracy of VPC
frequency in predicting adverse cardiac events was greater in patients
who did than did not undergo thrombolysis. At a sensitivity level of
40%, the positive predictive accuracy for cardiac mortality and arrhyt
hmic events for the group with thrombolysis was 19.4% and 25.8%, respe
ctively, compared with 16% and 16% for those without thrombolysis. Mor
eover, the highest VPC frequency for the dichotomy of patients into hi
gh- and low-risk groups was 25 VPCs/hour after thrombolysis, but 10 VP
Cs/hour for patients without thrombolysis. VPC frequency appears to be
more highly predictive of prognosis after AMI in patients who have un
dergone thrombolysis than in those who have not, but the optimal frequ
ency for dichotomy is higher in the former.