Ab. Becker et al., EFFECTS OF JET ENGINE NOISE AND PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK ON PERCEIVED WORKLOAD IN A MONITORING TASK, The International journal of aviation psychology, 5(1), 1995, pp. 49-62
This study examined the effects of exposure to intermittent jet aircra
ft noise (70 dBA or 95 dBA maximum intensity) and knowledge of results
concerning signal detections (hit-KR) on performance efficiency and p
erceived workload in a 40-min visual vigilance task. The noise feature
d a Doppler-like quality in which planes seemed to approach from the m
onitor's left and recede to the right. Perceptual sensitivity (d') was
poorer in the context of noise than in quiet but only in the presence
of hit-KR. The lack of noise-related performance differences in the a
bsence of hit-KR most likely reflected a ''floor effect'' rather than
some special relation between noise and feedback. When compared to sub
jects performing in quiet, those who operated in noise were less able
to profit from hit-KR, a result that may reflect the effects of noise
on information processing. In addition to its negative effects on sign
al detectability, noise elevated the perceived workload, as measured b
y the NASA-TLX. This effect was robust; it was independent of the pres
ence of hit-KR, even though hit-KR generally lowered the overall level
of perceived workload. The results provide the initial experimental d
emonstration that perceived workload is a sensitive measure of the eff
ects of aircraft noise in monitoring tasks.