Kj. Sarno et Cd. Wickens, ROLE OF MULTIPLE RESOURCES IN PREDICTING TIME-SHARING EFFICIENCY - EVALUATION OF 3 WORKLOAD MODELS IN A MULTIPLE-TASK SETTING, The International journal of aviation psychology, 5(1), 1995, pp. 107-130
The goal of our study was to assess the validity of the assumptions un
derlying three prominent workload models: the Time-Line Analysis and P
rediction workload model (Parks & Boucek, 1989), the VACP workload mod
el (Aldrich, Szabo, & Bierbaum, 1989), and the W/INDEX model (North &
Riley, 1989). Sixteen subjects flew a low-fidelity flight simulation.
Subjects were required to perform a two-axis tracking task, a concurre
nt visual-monitoring task, and a discrete decision task. The decision
task had 16 variations defined by two levels on each of the following
dimensions: input modality (visual vs. auditory), processing code (spa
tial vs. verbal), difficulty (easy vs. hard), and response modality (m
anual vs. voice). Dual-task costs were found only for the tracking tas
k. The tracking data were then analyzed using two approaches: a tradit
ional analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a correlational analysis of tra
cking performance versus model predictions. The ANOVA revealed that pe
rformance on the tracking task was better when the concurrent decision
task was responded to vocally and was easy. Input modality and proces
sing code of the concurrent decision task had no significant effect on
tracking performance. The correlational analysis was used to evaluate
each of the three models, to determine what features were responsible
for improving the models' fit, and to compare their performance with
a pure time-line model that makes no multiple-resource assumptions. Al
l three models did a good job of predicting variance between experimen
tal conditions, accounting for between 56% and 84% of the variance in
our data and between 10% and 40% of an earlier data set. Different fea
tures of each model that affect the fit are then discussed. We conclud
e that it is important for models to retain a multiple-resource coding
, although the best features of that coding remain to be determined. C
oding tasks by their demand level appears to be less critical.