Water content, ash, HMF, diastase activity, electrical conductivity, p
H, proline and microscopic characteristics of 174 samples of unifloral
honeys from thyme, chestnut, cotton, heather, orange, sunflower, pine
and fir honeydew have been analysed. Differences among the correspond
ing values are given. The honeys from pine, fir, chestnut and heather
have a high pH, electrical conductivity and ash, but a low HMF. Thyme
honey has high diastase and proline content where as orange honey show
s the lowest values for pH, proline, diastase activity, ash and electr
ical conductivity. Sunflower and cotton honeys have no distinct charac
teristics. Predominant pollen was found in thyme, sunflower, heather a
nd chestnut honeys. More than 20 pollen types were found in pine and t
hyme honeys, 15-20 in fir, sunflower and heather and 10-15 in chestnut
, cotton and orange honeys.