Mh. Cummings et al., PREVALENCE OF MICROALBUMINURIA, LIPOPROTEIN (A) AND CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE IN THE LIPID CLINIC, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 49(1), 1996, pp. 19-23
Aims-To assess the prevalence of micro-albuminuria (MA) and elevated s
erum lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) concentration, and their association wit
h coronary artery disease (CAD) and other conventional cardiovascular
risk factors in non-diabetic patients attending a lipid clinic. Method
s-Clinical details were obtained from 96 consecutive non-diabetic pati
ents from whom a fasting blood sample was taken to measure serum lipid
, lipoprotein, apolipoprotein and plasma glucose, urea, and electrolyt
e concentrations. The urine albumin/creatinine ratio (U-a/U-c) was est
imated from a random clinic sample. Results-Of the patients, 26% had M
A (defined as a U-a/U-c > 2.2 mg/mu mol), 38% had an elevated Lp (a) c
oncentration (defined as > 0.4 g/l), 36% were hypertensive (blood pres
sure > 160/95) or were taking antihypertensive medication, and 25% had
established CAD defined on clinical criteria. In men the U-a/U-c rati
o was highly associated with age, plasma low density lipoprotein chole
sterol, and triglyceride concentrations. In women there was no associa
tion between the U-a/U-c ratio and variables examined. Lp (a) concentr
ation was not associated with variables examined in either sex. In mul
tiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex, serum Lp
(a) concentration, diastolic blood pressure and treatment of hyperlipi
daemia were highly associated with CAD. MA was not, however, associate
d with CAD. Conclusions-MA is common in a lipid clinic and is more Lik
ely to be found among older male patients with hyperlipidaemia. Howeve
r, in contrast with Lp (a) concentrations, MA is not a risk factor for
CAD in this high risk population. Lp (a) concentration may be a usefu
l tool in the lipid clinic, but there does not seem to be a justificat
ion for measuring the U-a/U-c ratio, at least in non-diabetic subjects
.