INCIDENCE OF ENDOGENOUS VIRAL GENES IN LEGHORN STRAINS OF DIFFERENT ORIGIN, EACH WITH SUBLINES OF A DIFFERENT GENOTYPE FOR RESISTANCE TO AVIAN-LEUKOSIS VIRUS-INFECTION

Citation
N. Urbani et al., INCIDENCE OF ENDOGENOUS VIRAL GENES IN LEGHORN STRAINS OF DIFFERENT ORIGIN, EACH WITH SUBLINES OF A DIFFERENT GENOTYPE FOR RESISTANCE TO AVIAN-LEUKOSIS VIRUS-INFECTION, Journal of animal breeding and genetics, 112(5-6), 1995, pp. 421-429
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
ISSN journal
09312668
Volume
112
Issue
5-6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
421 - 429
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-2668(1995)112:5-6<421:IOEVGI>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The identification of genes affecting disease resistance in domestic f owl has challenged research workers in various countries, in the study of their effects and in the evaluation of their potential for commerc ial poultry breeding. This study concerns endogenous viral genes (ev g enes), which can play an important role in the response to avian leuko sis virus infection. The incidence of ev genes was determined in three experimental White Leghorn strains of different origin, each consisti ng of two sublines genotypically either susceptible or resistant to in fection from avian leukosis virus (ALV) of the subgroups A and B. The three pairs of sublines had been used extensively for investigations o f the effects of leukosis infections in laying hens. Among the 11 ev g enes found, only three were present in all three strains - ev1 and ev3 , which appear to be very common in While Leghorn, and ev6, which has been associated with reduced immune response to ALV infection. Five of the 11 ev genes found occurred only in one of the three strains, whil e the number of different ev genes in each of the strains amounted to either six or seven. The frequency of each ev gene present in a strain was surprisingly similar in the genotypically resistant and susceptib le subline. With the exception of ev1 and ev3, which were present in a ll three strains at a relatively high frequency, there were striking d ifferences between the strains in the level of frequencies of the addi tional ev genes. In one of the strains, which originated from a commer cial hybrid, this level was exceptionally low while the additional ev genes had much higher frequencies in the other two strains. The inform ation about the incidence of eu genes, and specifically that about ev6 , suggested a plausible explanation for the striking difference observ ed between the three Leghorn stains in their respect to ALV infection and, in particular, the rate of congenital ALV infection.