COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF FREE-ENERGIES OF SOLVATION OF PHENYLIMIDAZOLE INHIBITORS OF CYTOCHROME P450CAM BY FREE-ENERGY SIMULATION, AMSOL, AND POISSON-BOLTZMANN METHODS
D. Harris et G. Loew, COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF FREE-ENERGIES OF SOLVATION OF PHENYLIMIDAZOLE INHIBITORS OF CYTOCHROME P450CAM BY FREE-ENERGY SIMULATION, AMSOL, AND POISSON-BOLTZMANN METHODS, Journal of computational chemistry, 17(3), 1996, pp. 273-288
Free energies of solvation of phenylimidazole inhibitors of cytochrome
P450 cam were determined using (1) free energy simulation, (2) AMSOL-
SM2 semiempirical methods, and (3) Poisson-Boltzmann methods. The goal
s of this study were threefold: (1) to compare the results obtained fr
om the three different methods, (2) to investigate the effect of inclu
sion of intraperturbed group interactions on free energy simulation es
timates of solvation free energy differences, and (3) to investigate t
o what extent differences in free energies of solvation among three of
these inhibitors could account for observed differences in their enzy
me binding free energies. In general, relative solvation free energies
obtained from the free energy simulations and AMSOL-SM2 methods give
comparable results (i.e., the same rank ordering and similar quantitat
ive results, differing significantly from results obtained using Poiss
on-Boltzmann methods). The free energy simulation studies suggest that
the neglect of intrapertubed group interactions had little effect on
rank order of free energies of solvation of the polar phenylimidazoles
. The relative desolvation free energies of the three inhibitors of P4
50 cam-1-phenylimidazole (1-PI), 2-phenylimidazole (2-PI), and 4-pheny
limidazole (4-PI)-with known enzyme bound X-ray structures parallel th
at of their known binding affinities and could account for most of the
differences in the free energies of binding of these three inhibitors
to P450 cam. The origin of the difference of the free energies of sol
ution of these three inhibitors is primarily the additional interactio
n between solvent and N-H group in the imidazole ring of 2- and 4-phen
ylimidazole that is absent in the 1-phenylimidazole isomer. This hypot
hesis is substantiated by a second comparison of the relative solvatio
n free energies of 4-phenylimidazole with its methylated derivative, 3
-methyl-4-phenylimidazole, also lacking an N-H group. (C) 1996 by John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.