Jf. Quaranta et al., EVALUATION OF PACKED RED-BLOOD-CELL TRANS FUSION PRACTICE IN ANESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE-CARE, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 15(1), 1996, pp. 20-26
Objective: To assess the relevance of perioperative packed red blood c
ell (PRBC) transfusion practice at the University Hospital of Nice, co
mpared with information from the consensus conference on red blood cel
l transfusion, held by the French Society of Anaesthesia and intensive
Care (SFAR) and the National Agency for the Development of Medical Ev
aluation (ANDEM) in December 1993. Study design: Retrospective case se
ries analysis. Patients: The study included 240 medical files of surgi
cal patients, transfused in 1994 with PRBC, obtained by drawing of lot
s following a methodology recommended by ANDEM. Method: A reference li
st according to the statement of the consensus conference was designed
for the various surgical specialities and the ICU in which PRBC had b
een transfused. It included the clinical and laboratory criteria which
justified the transfusion, as well as the various categories of PRBC
(phenotyped, cytomegalovirus negative, leukocyte-depleted, etc). Autot
ransfused PRBC were also considered. The data collected from the medic
al files of the 240 patients were compared with the reference list. Re
sults: In 84,6% of patients (203/240), the PRBC transfusion had been d
ecided with reference either only to a haematocrit level below 0.27 or
a level between 0.27 and 0.30 associated with clinical evidence of ba
d tolerance of blood loss, according to the reference list. A lack of
compliance with the reference list occurred in 15.4% of patients (37/2
40), who had been transfused without any reference to a biological cri
terion. Another non compliance existed in 50% of patients (12/24) tran
sfused with phenotyped PRBC and in 35.3% (6/17) of those transfused wi
th leucocyte-depleted PRBC. An autotransfusion with PRBC had been carr
ied out in 30.4% of patients (75/240). Discussion: These deviations of
transfusion practice from the consensus conference statement, which w
ere more pronounced with phenotyped and leucocyte-depleted PRCB than c
onventional PRBC, resulted in the edition of a report, with an analysi
s of the causes of deviations and recommendations for all doctors of o
ur institution prescribing blood transfusions. Another evaluation, ext
ended also to the medical specialities of our hospital and including a
ll blood derivates is planned for 1996.