One can identify compelling reasons for private and public organizatio
ns to embrace participative systems. Scholars and organizational consu
ltants maintain that organizations need such systems to prosper in an
increasingly competitive and turbulent world, and that such changes ar
e now taking place. Yet, participative techniques have diffused minima
lly. Why is there such a discrepancy between the endorsements and adop
tion of participative methods, despite the strong arguments for them a
nd their intuitive appeal? This paper maintains that barriers to parti
cipative systems are embedded in social, economic, and political princ
iples deeply valued in their own right. Writings on participative syst
ems treat these barriers as difficult problems that can be overcome th
rough patient, well-designed behavioral and organizational interventio
ns. In contrast, we suggest that the structures and attitudes impeding
participative systems are usually valued more highly than the prospec
tive gains from the systems, and that, in the future, true participati
ve systems will have difficulty sustaining themselves in an organizati
onal landscape that continues to favor systems of centralized control.
Similar impediments operating in areas as different as management and
government regulation suggest basic processes that rise above specifi
c contexts. The paper draws on two pertinent but heretofore disconnect
ed scholarly literatures-the literatures on cooperation and on collabo
ration-to analyze the experiences with participative systems in manage
ment and regulatory policy. Four themes-prior dispositions toward coop
eration, social and political organization, the nature of purposes, is
sues, and values, and leadership capacity and style-are critical to un
derstanding each area. Generally, participative systems bump into prob
lems of collective action: dispositions against cooperating with prior
adversaries, the costs of collaboration in complex social and politic
al systems, the difficulties of engaging deep conflicts, and leadershi
p incentives favoring control that develop in this context. These cond
itions repeatedly undermine incipient, fragile participative systems.
The study of participation would benefit from closer attention to how
social, economic, and political structures constrain or facilitate suc
h systems, and more extensive links among the various literatures on t
he subject.