K. Matsuyama, NEW GOODS, MARKET FORMATIONS, AND PITFALLS OF SYSTEM-DESIGN, Journal of the Japanese and international economies, 9(4), 1995, pp. 376-402
The standard practice in economic theory is to assume that all the rel
evant variables (e.g., the space of all the goods of potential economi
c value) and all the relevant constraints are known to the policymaker
or to the designer of an economic system. This often unstated assumpt
ion (or the belief implicitly embodied in it) inadvertently creates an
illusion about our ability to design an economic system and control t
he process of resource allocation. In this paper, a series of examples
is developed to illustrate that this modeling approach has the danger
of misdirecting our attention when evaluating alternative forms of an
economic system. Some implications for reforms in the former socialis
t economies are also drawn, J. Japan. Int. Econ., December 1995, 9(4),
pp. 376-402. Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanst
on, Illinois 60208; NBER; and TCER. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.