This paper provides information on the safety of ultrasonic diagnostic
procedures as currently used in veterinary practice. The known mechan
isms of action are described and selected literature on biological eff
ects of ultrasound is reviewed. Current international consensus is pre
sented on the safety of medical ultrasound with respect to thermal eff
ects. To date, there is no independently verified clinical evidence th
at the level of exposure delivered to the tissues during scanned grey-
scale ('B-mode') imaging has any adverse effects. Lung haemorrhage has
been observed in animal experiments using diagnostic exposures, but t
he effects have not been reported in the foetus. Equipment that uses p
ulsed Doppler transmits higher acoustic outputs in a stationary beam,
and can produce temperature increases that may have significant biolog
ical consequences. When considering sonographic and pulsed Doppler exa
minations of the prenatal animal, the safety margins are small and the
operator should be aware of the acoustic output of the equipment, the
exposure time, and the sensitivity of target tissues.