V. Velanovich, SHOULD GENERAL SURGEONS PERFORM SPECIALTY PROCEDURES - AN OUTCOME EXPERIENCE WITH REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY, The American surgeon, 62(2), 1996, pp. 156-158
Recent health care reform proposals have emphasized the need for ''gen
eralists'' over ''specialists.'' Particularly targeted are the ''surgi
cal specialities.'' If much of this reform comes to pass, this may lea
ve patients for whom the only surgical care may come from the general
surgeon. In this setting, opportunities exist for the general surgeon
to provide services that now are claimed by surgical specialists. This
study reports the outcome experience of one general surgeon providing
one such procedure, reduction mammoplasty, to a beneficiary populatio
n. Over a 26 month period, 50 reduction mammoplasties were performed.
An average of 1527 grams of breast tissue were removed from each patie
nt. There were no episodes of nipple necrosis or other complications r
equiring reoperation. At 1-26 months follow-up, all patients had relie
f of presenting symptoms, 90 per cent of patients had normal nipple se
nsation; all patients were satisfied with the results and would have t
he operation again by the same surgeon. These results show that a moti
vated and well-trained general surgeon can provide specialty surgical
care to a potentially underserved population. General surgeons should
be allowed to develop and practice the full range of skills they will
need to take advantage of the opportunities that will be available to
the surgical ''generalist.''