INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM INVOLVING AN AUTOSOMAL STRUCTURAL ABNORMALITY DIAGNOSED PRENATALLY THROUGH AMNIOCENTESIS- A COLLABORATIVE STUDY
Lyf. Hsu et al., INCIDENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM INVOLVING AN AUTOSOMAL STRUCTURAL ABNORMALITY DIAGNOSED PRENATALLY THROUGH AMNIOCENTESIS- A COLLABORATIVE STUDY, Prenatal diagnosis, 16(1), 1996, pp. 1-28
Among 179 663 prenatal diagnosis cases collected from ten institutions
and two publications, 555 (0.3 per cent) were diagnosed as having chr
omosome mosaicism. Of these, 57 (10.3 per cent) were mosaic for an aut
osomal structural abnormality, 28 (5 per cent) for a sex chromosome st
ructural abnormality, and 85 (15.3 per cent) were mosaic for a marker
chromosome. Ninety-five cases of prenatally diagnosed mosaicism with a
structural abnormality in an autosome and a normal cell line, and wit
h a known phenotypic outcome, were collected for karyotype-phenotype c
orrelations through our collaboration (40 cases), a prior survey (26 c
ases), and published reports (29 cases). They included 13 balanced rec
iprocal translocations, one unbalanced reciprocal translocation, four
balanced Robertsonian translocations, four unbalanced Robertsonian tra
nslocations, four inversions, 17 deletions, three ring chromosomes, 19
i(20q), seven +i(12p), six other isochromosomes, and 17 partial triso
mies resulting from a duplication or other rearrangement. All cases mo
saic for a balanced structural rearrangement resulted in a normal phen
otype. All cases of 46/46,i(20q) resulted in normal liveborns. Five of
seven cases with 46/47,+i(12p) had an abnormal phenotype compatible w
ith Killian-Pallister syndrome, The overall risk for an abnormal outco
me for a mosaic case with an unbalanced structural abnormality, exclud
ing 46/46,(20q) and 46/47,+i(12p), is 40.4 per cent. In the same categ
ory, the study also suggested a correlation between the percentage of
abnormal cells and an abnormal phenotype. For mosaicism involving a te
rminal deletion, the possibility of a familial fragile site should be
considered.