Mc. Olson et al., HELICAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AT 1.5 1 PITCH RECONSTRUCTED AT 15-MM AND7-MM INTERVALS FOR EXAMINATION OF PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED METASTATIC DISEASE/, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal, 47(1), 1996, pp. 54-58
OBJECTIVE: To document the need for overlapped reconstruction when usi
ng helical computed tomography (CT) software that reconstructs 10-mm-c
ollimation, 1.5:1-pitch images at 15-mm intervals in follow-up examina
tion of patients with suspected metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHO
DS: Forty consecutive patients with known or suspected metastatic dise
ase were examined with helical CT at 10-mm collimation and 1.5:1 pitch
. The studies were examinations of the chest, abdomen and pelvis; the
chest and abdomen; or the abdomen and pelvis. Two image sets, one pros
pectively reconstructed at 15-mm intervals and the other retrospective
ly reconstructed at 7-mm intervals, were independently reviewed by thr
ee radiologists, and the number, size and location of lesions were doc
umented. Differences in interpretation were resolved by consensus. The
lesions detected on the two sets of images were classified according
to lesion size and location, and the results were analysed by multivar
iate analysis of variance with repeated measures. RESULTS: Images reco
nstructed at 7-mm intervals revealed a total of 436 lesions, 127 (41%)
more than were revealed by images reconstructed at 15-mm intervals, T
he number of lesions less than 1 cm in diameter that were visible in t
he two sets of images was significantly different (p = 0.018). However
, there was no significant difference between the two sets of images i
n terms of lesion location. CONCLUSION: Metastatic lesions may be miss
ed by helical CT at 1.5:1 pitch if overlapped reconstruction is not pe
rformed.