Background: Accurate knowledge of polyp size is important in assessing
cancer risk in both clinical studies and individual patients. We soug
ht to determine if a difference exists between the endoscopic estimati
on of colon polyp size and the actual measurement after removal. Metho
ds: We measured polyps in a systematic fashion. Using open biopsy forc
eps as a guide, the largest diameter of 31 pedunculated polyps was est
imated endoscopically. The polyp was then removed by snare polypectomy
and directly measured by a technician who was blinded to the endoscop
ic estimate. Each polyp was also measured after formalin fixation by a
pathologist who was blinded to previous measurements. Results: There
was a significant difference between the endoscopic estimates and the
postpolypectomy measurements. Endoscopic estimates on average were 1.6
mm greater than the postpolypectomy measurements (p < 0.05), represen
ting an 18% difference. Twenty-three of the 31 (74%) endoscopic estima
tes were larger than the postpolypectomy measurements. There was not a
significant difference between the postpolypectomy and postfixation m
easurements. Conclusions: The size of polyps measured endoscopically i
s significantly larger on average than postpolypectomy measurements. T
his is most likely due to factors involved in the removal of the in vi
vo polyp.