PAIRED COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE CLASSIC 300 BONE-ANCHORED AND CONVENTIONAL BONE-CONDUCTION HEARING-AIDS IN TERMS OF SOUND QUALITY AND SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY
A. Ringdahl et al., PAIRED COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE CLASSIC 300 BONE-ANCHORED AND CONVENTIONAL BONE-CONDUCTION HEARING-AIDS IN TERMS OF SOUND QUALITY AND SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY, British journal of audiology, 29(6), 1995, pp. 299-307
Fourteen experienced users of bone-anchored hearing aids conducted pai
red comparisons of sound quality and speech intelligibility for 6 and
4 different stimuli respectively in the Classic 300 and a bone-conduct
ion hearing aid with a steel clip. Ten paired comparisons were made fo
r each stimulus. The patient selected the best hearing aid and rated t
he chosen hearing aid on a scale of 'somewhat better', 'better' and 'm
uch better'. The Classic 300 obtained a positive assessment in terms o
f sound quality and speech intelligibility far more frequently. All th
e patients chose the Classic 300 as the best hearing aid when they ass
essed the sound quality of the classical music stimulus.