PAIRED COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE CLASSIC 300 BONE-ANCHORED AND CONVENTIONAL BONE-CONDUCTION HEARING-AIDS IN TERMS OF SOUND QUALITY AND SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY

Citation
A. Ringdahl et al., PAIRED COMPARISONS BETWEEN THE CLASSIC 300 BONE-ANCHORED AND CONVENTIONAL BONE-CONDUCTION HEARING-AIDS IN TERMS OF SOUND QUALITY AND SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY, British journal of audiology, 29(6), 1995, pp. 299-307
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Otorhinolaryngology
ISSN journal
03005364
Volume
29
Issue
6
Year of publication
1995
Pages
299 - 307
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-5364(1995)29:6<299:PCBTC3>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Fourteen experienced users of bone-anchored hearing aids conducted pai red comparisons of sound quality and speech intelligibility for 6 and 4 different stimuli respectively in the Classic 300 and a bone-conduct ion hearing aid with a steel clip. Ten paired comparisons were made fo r each stimulus. The patient selected the best hearing aid and rated t he chosen hearing aid on a scale of 'somewhat better', 'better' and 'm uch better'. The Classic 300 obtained a positive assessment in terms o f sound quality and speech intelligibility far more frequently. All th e patients chose the Classic 300 as the best hearing aid when they ass essed the sound quality of the classical music stimulus.