D. Gasparotto et al., RECURRENCES AND 2ND PRIMARY TUMORS IN THE HEAD AND NECK REGION - DIFFERENTIATION BY P53 MUTATION ANALYSIS, Annals of oncology, 6(9), 1995, pp. 933-939
Background: Patients with head and neck cancer are at high risk of dev
eloping additional primary tumours in the aerodigestive tract as a res
ult of field cancerization phenomena. In this context, the appearance
of a new neoplasm often poses a problem of differential diagnosis betw
een recurrence and new primary tumour. The differentiation between the
two entities is essentially clinical and conventionally based on the
histological and spatio-temporal relations between the two lesions; ho
wever, the validity of these criteria has still to be assessed. Design
: To evaluate whether field cancerization phenomena may affect the cli
nical diagnosis of relapse/metastasis in the head and neck region, p53
mutation pattern was analysed in a series of primary tumours and corr
esponding recurrences/metastases. The rationale was that, since p53 mu
tations are a very early and polymorphic phenomenon, a recurrence/meta
stasis must retain the same mutation as the primary tumour, whereas in
dependent tumours are likely to display a different p53 gene status. R
esults:Molecular analysis provided conclusive results in 9 of 12 case
analysed. The clinical diagnosis of recurrence was confirmed by molecu
lar analysis in 4 of these cases. In contrast, a differential p53 muta
tion pattern supported an independent origin for 3 presumed local recu
rrences and 2 lung lesions. Conclusions: The use of p53 mutation analy
sis as a clonality marker allowed us to ascertain the inadequacy of th
e current diagnostic criteria for the differentiation between a new in
dependent tumour and recurrence/metastasis. These findings substantiat
e the relevance of field cancerization phenomena in the head and neck
region and prompt the use of p53 mutation analysis as a fundamental to
ol to improve the diagnosis and management of head and neck cancers.