QUANTIFYING MUSCLE TONE IN SPINAL-CORD INJURY PATIENTS USING ISOKINETIC DYNAMOMETRIC TECHNIQUES

Citation
K. Perell et al., QUANTIFYING MUSCLE TONE IN SPINAL-CORD INJURY PATIENTS USING ISOKINETIC DYNAMOMETRIC TECHNIQUES, Paraplegia, 34(1), 1996, pp. 46-53
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology",Orthopedics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00311758
Volume
34
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
46 - 53
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-1758(1996)34:1<46:QMTISI>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
The torque generated during a passive movement of the knee joint was u sed to quantify muscle tone in normal able-bodied subjects and spastic and flaccid spinal cord injury (SCI) subjects using a computerized is okinetic dynamometer. Maximum peak (T-max) and the sum of four consecu tive peaks (T-sum) were calculated for each velocity (30, 60, 120 degr ees/s) and for each phase (flexing or extending) separately and compar ed statistically using a one-way ANOVA, Statistical significance betwe en groups was found in T-max FLEXION (FLX) at 60 and 120 degrees/3. Sc heffe's tests revealed that the spastic group was significantly less t han both the flaccid and normal groups, although the flaccid and norma l groups were not significantly different from each other. The slopes of the linear regression curve of the torque-velocity data were found and compared statistically using a t-test for parallelism. In all para meters, the data increased in a linear fashion with increasing velocit y of knee motion. The slope of the regression curve for the spastic gr oup was significantly lower than that of the normal group for T-max an d was significantly lower than that of the flaccid group for T(sum)sig nificantly lower than that of the flaccid group for Tsum while the slo pes for the flaccid and normal groups were not significantly different . The ability of the entire set of variables to classify subjects into three groups (normal, spastic, and flaccid) was tested using discrimi nant analysis. By taking into account 7 of the 12 original variables, this multivariate technique correctly classified 100% of the spastic, 90% of the normal, but only 67% of the flaccid subjects. Separation of observations was between spastic and normal subjects was good, except for only one case. This feature could be useful when dealing with ass essment of individual responses to therapeutic interventions aimed at modification of spasticity.