Dw. Bates et al., PREVALENCE OF FATIGUE AND CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME IN A PRIMARY-CARE PRACTICE, Archives of internal medicine, 153(24), 1993, pp. 2759-2765
Background: Our goals were to determine the prevalence of unusual, deb
ilitating fatigue and the frequency with which it was associated with
the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or other physical or psychological
illness in an outpatient clinic population. Methods: We prospectively
evaluated a cohort of 1000 consecutive patients in a primary care clin
ic in an urban, hospital-based general medicine practice. The study pr
otocol included a detailed history, physical examination, and laborato
ry and psychiatric testing. Results: Five patients who came because of
CFS studies were excluded. Of the remaining 995, 323 reported fatigue
, and 271 (27%) complained of at least 6 months of unusual fatigue tha
t interfered with their daily lives. Of the 271, self-report or record
review revealed a medical or psychiatric condition that could have ex
plained the fatigue in 186 (69%). Thus, 85 (8.5%) of 995 patients had
a debilitating fatigue of at least 6 months' duration, without apparen
t cause. Of these patients, 48 refused further evaluation, and II were
unavailable for follow-up; 26 completed the protocol. Three of the 26
were hypothyroid, and one had a major psychiatric disorder. Of the re
maining 22 patients, three met Centers for Disease Control and Prevent
ion criteria for CFS, four met British criteria, and 10 met the Austra
lian case definition. The point prevalences of CFS were thus 0.3% (95%
confidence interval ICI], O% to 0.6%), 0.4% (95% CI, O% to 0.8%), and
1.0% (95% CI, 0.4% to 1.6%) using the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, British, and Australian case definitions, respectively. T
hese estimates were conservative, because they assumed that none of th
e patients who refused evaluation or were unavailable for follow-up wo
uld meet criteria far CFS. Conclusions: While chronic, debilitating fa
tigue is common in medical outpatients, CFS is relatively uncommon. Pr
evalence depends substantially on the case definition used.