Eh. Christiansen et al., WITHIN-PATIENT AND BETWEEN-PATIENT VARIATION OF THE SIGNAL-AVERAGED P-WAVE IN CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE, PACE, 19(1), 1996, pp. 72-81
Objectives: To estimate interobserver, within-patient and between-pati
ent variation of the signal-averaged P wave. To determine whether demo
graphic, clinical, conventional ECG information, and coronary angiogra
phic data are associated with the signal-averaged P wave duration in p
atients with documented coronary artery disease. Background: A prolong
ed signal-averaged P wave may indicate the presence of a substrate for
atrial tachyarrhythmias and may predict subsequent development of atr
ial fibrillation. However, information on variation, reproducibility,
and determinants of the signal-averaged P wave are sparse. Methods: On
e hundred ninety-three patients with angiographically documented coron
ary artery disease underwent two consecutive procedures of signal-aver
aging of P waves (SAECG1 and SAECG2). Interobserver, within-patient, a
nd between-patient variation of the signal-averaged P wave was estimat
ed (coefficient of variation: SD/mean). Multiple linear regression ana
lysis was applied to identify parameters independently associated with
signal-averaged P wave duration ISA-P). Atrial late potentials were c
onsidered if SA-P > 140 ms, and logistic regression analysis was appli
ed to identify parameters associated with the presence of atrial late
potentials. Results: The interobserver, within-patient, and between-pa
tient coefficients of variation for the signal-averaged P wave duratio
n were 7.5%, 6.0%, and 8.4%, respectively. The:signal-averaged P wave
duration correlated significantly with standard ECG P wave duration an
d height of the patient (r = 0.59). Forty-nine percent of the patients
had atrial late potentials. P wave duration in the standard ECG corre
ctly classified 73% (140/188) of the patients with respect to atrial l
ate potential positivity or negativity. The sensitivity was 67% and th
e specificity was 78%. Agreement on the presence or absence of atrial
late potentials between two observers was present in 71% (136/193) of
the patients, and in 78% (151/193) between SAECG1 and SAECG2. Conclusi
ons: The signal-averaged P wave has limited reproducibility in patient
s with coronary artery disease, and a normal or abnormal signal-averag
ed P wave can be predicted from the conventional ECG with high accurac
y. It is recommended that the signal-averaged P wave be compared with
the standard ECG P wave duration in follow-up studies with the aim of
predicting atrial fibrillation.