EFFECTS OF ISOMETRIC STRENGTH TRAINING ON QUADRICEPS MUSCLE PROPERTIES IN OVER 55 YEAR OLDS

Citation
L. Welsh et Om. Rutherford, EFFECTS OF ISOMETRIC STRENGTH TRAINING ON QUADRICEPS MUSCLE PROPERTIES IN OVER 55 YEAR OLDS, European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 72(3), 1996, pp. 219-223
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
ISSN journal
03015548
Volume
72
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
219 - 223
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-5548(1996)72:3<219:EOISTO>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Changes in strength, speed and size of the quadriceps muscle have been investigated in elderly men and women after 6 months of isometric str ength training. We have also indirectly investigated the role of metab olites as a stimulus for muscle hypertrophy by studying two training p rotocols. One thigh was trained using short, intermittent contractions (IC), while the other trained using long, continuous contractions (CC ). This meant that there should be a greater metabolite change in the muscle performing CC, as the blood flow is occluded for longer. Nine s ubjects [eight women, mean (SE) age, 71.8 (2.9) years] were measured f or contractile properties and strength before and after training, and compared to nine age-matched controls [71.5 (2.1) years]. The training group increased quadriceps strength by 48.7 (9.1)% (P < 0.005) and 53 .1 (11.3)% (P < 0.005) following the IO and CC protocols, respectively . There was no change in muscle strength in the controls. Both muscles showed significant slowing after training as measured by the relaxati on times and the force-frequency ratio. There were non-significant dec reases in muscle fatigability after training. The control group also s howed some significant decreases in fatigability and muscle speed. The training group showed significant increases in muscle (and bone) cros s-sectional area of 4.0 (1.7)% and 4.9 (1.3)% following the CC and IC protocols, respectively. These increases were significantly different from the decrease observed in the control group. These findings sugges t that people over the age of 55 still have the capacity to increase m uscle strength and size, and that the training causes slowing of the m uscle. Muscle hypertrophy does not seem to be strongly influenced by m etabolite changes in this age group, as there were no differences in m easurements observed between protocols.