An analysis is introduced, based on the decomposition of relative grow
th rates, to examine the mode of competition (i.e. whether competition
is symmetric or asymmetric), the size-dependence of growth, and their
interdependence. In particular, the basis for two commonly held Views
is examined: (1) that the type of resource limitation determines the
mode of competition, and (2) that asymmetric competition always leads
to size-divergence between unequal competitors. It is shown that in he
ld-grown miller plants, competition for light was symmetric at low den
sity and asymmetric at high density. However, size variation at low de
nsity decreased during growth, because small plants had greater relati
ve growth rates than larger plants. Size variation stayed constant at
high density, since plants of all sizes had equal average relative gro
wth rates. Based on these results and a general discussion, it is prop
osed that the type of resource limitation does not determine the mode
of competition. Competition for light can be symmetric, and foraging f
or heterogeneously distributed soil resources can produce asymmetric c
ompetition below-ground. Furthermore, the mode of competition alone do
es not determine size structure dynamics. Size-dependence of resource
conversion efficiency and allocation can modify the effects of resourc
e uptake on growth. (C) 1996 Annals of Botany Company