Gj. Grant et al., THORACIC VERSUS LUMBAR ADMINISTRATION OF EPIDURAL MORPHINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER THORACOTOMY, Regional anesthesia, 18(6), 1993, pp. 351-355
Background and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to compare th
e effects of thoracic and lumbar epidural morphine on pulmonary functi
on and analgesia after thoracotomy for pulmonary resection. Methods. T
wenty-seven patients were randomized into two groups to receive either
thoracic or lumbar epidural morphine as needed for postoperative anal
gesia. Postoperative pain was assessed hourly on a 10-cm visual analog
scale (VAS), and epidural morphine was administered in 3 mg doses for
a VAS score >2 cm. Patients underwent pulmonary function tests (force
d vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at 1 second, peak expirator
y flow) preoperatively, and 24 hours postoperatively. Results were exp
ressed as mean +/- 1 SE and analyzed using Student's t-test and Studen
t-Newman-Keuls test at p < 0.05. Results. Twenty patients completed th
e study (n = 10 per group). Patients in the thoracic group required 3.
1 +/- 0.4 injections to a total morphine dose of 11.9 +/- IA mg during
the first 24 hours postoperatively, and those in the lumbar group req
uired 4.7 +/- 0.4 doses to a total 24.hour morphine dose of 16.4 +/- 1
.2 mg (p < 0.05). Median hourly VAS scores were similar in both groups
. Postoperative pulmonary function decreased in both groups without in
tergroup differences. Conclusions. The authors conclude that thoracic
epidural morphine administration in patients after thoracotomy results
in decreased morphine requirements and the same degree of analgesia a
s does lumbar administration.