OUTCOME OF PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION IN ILIAC ARTERY STENTS

Citation
Mr. Sapoval et al., OUTCOME OF PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION IN ILIAC ARTERY STENTS, Radiology, 198(2), 1996, pp. 481-486
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
00338419
Volume
198
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
481 - 486
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-8419(1996)198:2<481:OOPIII>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of secondary procedures in iliac artery stents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients (36 l imbs) underwent one or more interventional procedures in iliac artery stents to treat restenosis (n = 30) or occlusion (n = 6). All patients were followed up by means of clinical and angiographic examination. P rimary and secondary patency were assessed with angiography, duplex ul trasound, or both. Primary patency was determined after one interventi onal procedure, and secondary patency was determined at the end of the study (mean +/- standard deviation, 20.1 months +/- 17.5; range, 1-58 months). RESULTS: Immediate angiographic success was achieved in all cases. Four complications were observed. The primary and secondary cum ulative patency rates were 77.5% +/- 7.6 and 94% +/- 4.1 at 6 months, 73% +/- 8.4 and 89.3% +/- 6 at 12 months, and 51.4% +/- 10.9 and 78.8% +/- 8.8 at 2 years. At the end of the study, 80% of the arteries were still nominally patent. CONCLUSION: Restenosis and chronic occlusion in iliac artery stents can be treated with percutaneous interventional procedures; however, stenosis can still recur.