Spatial analysis is nor characterized by any single innovation in geog
raphy, but by a coalescence of several pre-existing ideas in a conjunc
ture of knowledge production that became particularly attractive in th
e historical and geographical context of postwar industrial society. A
n influential group dissented from this conjuncture, engaging in an ex
tensive critique of spatial analysis and eventually developing an alte
rnative, social theoretical approach in the 1970s and 1980s. Differenc
es and similarities between spatial analysts and these dissidents can
be seen in their views on science and explanation, and in their incorp
oration of space into geographic theory-differences that seem less sig
nificant today in the light of shifting positions and recent debates.
Spatial analysis and its dissidents still differ quite fundamentally,
however, in their theories of society.