A methodology for addressing structural transformation is illustrated
with material from hunter-gatherer societies. A proper account of the
transformation between types of social structure is in three basic ste
ps. First, a separate, full analysis for each type is required, in ord
er to discern which among its array of distinctive institutions is gen
eratively fundamental; it is upon this fundamental institution that th
e transformation is focused. Secondly, an examination of the principle
s of structuring exemplified in each type is needed; this permits the
question of legitimacy relating to the transformation to be addressed.
Finally, the cultural change which underpins the transformation shoul
d be explained. Three types of hunter-gatherer social structure are us
ed Eskimo/Bushman, Northwest Coast Indian and Australian. Particular a
ttention is paid to the logic of the social structure among the Austra
lian, and to revealing the contrasting principles of structuring that
pertain to the three types. Eskimo/Bushman institutions are shown to b
e informed more by 'information structuring', whilst Northwest Coast I
ndian and Australian are informed more by 'authority structuring'; in
terms of legitimacy this is a radical difference.