D. Kaiser et al., VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY - INDICATIONS, RESULTS, COMPLICATIONS, AND CONTRAINDICATIONS, The thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon, 41(6), 1993, pp. 330-334
In recent times minimally invasive surgery has secured a firm place am
ong the therapeutic options in thoracic surgery. The experience and re
sults gained from video-assisted surgery on 109 patients between Janua
ry 1, 1992 and July 31, 1993 are critically discussed. The procedure c
ould be completed thoracoscopically on 94 of them. A change of method
was necessary nine times for technical reasons and six times for oncol
ogical reasons (two times due to metastasis, four times due to bronchi
al carcinoma). A total of 154 individual operations were conducted. Si
xty-three patients with recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax were succes
sfully treated. The relapse rate was 1.5%. With the exception of three
rethoracotomies (one due to postoperative hemorrhaging and two to per
sistent fistula) no significant complications occurred. Further indica
tions included capsulated pleural empyema (n = 1), persistent hematoth
orax (n = 2), pleurectomy for malignant pleural effusion (n = 2), pleu
ral tumors (n = 3), pulmonary parenchyma (n = 2), interstitial lung di
seases (n = 3), bullous emphysema (n = 2), peripheral lung nodules (n
= 18), mediastinal tumors (n = 8), and sympathectomy (n = 2). The adva
ntages of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for patients include co
smetic considerations, low pain, earlier postoperative mobilization, a
nd for some indications, a shorter operation period. The significant d
isadvantages for the surgeon are the loss of binocular vision as well
as the impossibility of intraoperative palpation.