DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY OF IPRATROPIUM BROMIDE AEROSOL ON MAXIMUM EXERCISE PERFORMANCE IN STABLE PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE

Citation
A. Ikeda et al., DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY OF IPRATROPIUM BROMIDE AEROSOL ON MAXIMUM EXERCISE PERFORMANCE IN STABLE PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE, Thorax, 51(1), 1996, pp. 48-53
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Respiratory System
Journal title
ThoraxACNP
ISSN journal
00406376
Volume
51
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
48 - 53
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-6376(1996)51:1<48:DSOIBA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Background - Although the bronchodilating effect of inhaled anticholin ergics has been established in patients with chronic obstructive pulmo nary disease (COPD), their effects on exercise capacity are still cont roversial. Previous studies have suggested that the standard dosage ha rdly affects exercise tolerance, whereas higher doses might elicit an improvement. The aim of the present study was to determine the dose of ipratropium bromide aerosol that improves exercise performance using progressive cycle ergometry in patients with stable COPD. Methods - Tw enty men with stable COPD of mean (SD) age 69.2 (4.6) years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) 1.00 (0.37) 1 were studied i n a randomised double blind manner. Each patient received ipratropium bromide in doses of 240 mu g, 160 mu g, 80 mu g, 40 mu g, and placebo from a metered dose inhaler (MDI) with an InspirEase spacer on five se parate days. Spirometric parameters were assessed before and at 30, 60 , 90, and 120 minutes after each inhalation, and pulse rate and blood pressure were also measured immediately before each spirometric measur ement. Symptom limited progressive (20 watts/min) cycle ergometer exer cise tests were performed 90 minutes after each inhalation. Results - Ipratropium bromide in doses of 160 mu g and 240 mu g produced a great er increase in FEV(1) than 40 mu g or 80 mu g ipratropium bromide at a ll time points. Doses of 160 mu g and 240 mu g ipratropium bromide als o produced greater increases in maximal work load and maximal oxygen c onsumption than placebo, whereas 40 mu g and 80 mu g ipratropium bromi de did not. There was a weak correlation between the change in FEV(1) and the change in maximal work load (r = 0.45). No differences were fo und in pulse rate or blood pressure between the treatment and placebo groups, and no side effects were noted throughout the study. Conclusio ns - A dose of at least four times the standard dose of ipratropium br omide from an MDI with a spacer device was necessary to improve maxima l cycle exercise capacity in patients with stable COPD. Although the d ata from cycle ergometry cannot be directly applied to exercise perfor med during day to day activities, it is conceivable that the recommend ed doses of ipratropium bromide do not elicit the optimal clinical ben efits.