Mb. Blank et al., CASE MANAGER FOLLOW-UP TO FAILED APPOINTMENTS AND SUBSEQUENT SERVICE UTILIZATION, Community mental health journal, 32(1), 1996, pp. 23-31
Case manager responses to failed appointments were monitored for 83 se
riously mentally ill persons in a rural community mental health center
. Case manager actions taken were grouped into four categories of foll
ow-up from most intensive to least intensive: home visit, phone call,
letter, and no follow-up. On the whole, case managers most frequently
did not follow-up missed appointments (56.7%), followed up by letters
(21.3%), and telephone calls (18.7%), and home visits (3.3%). Analyses
revealed that home visits were most intensive and all clients who wer
e visited following failed appointments did not fail the subsequent ap
pointment. Clients who received telephone calls or letters were about
equally likely to fail the subsequent appointment, but were much more
likely to attend the subsequent appointment than were clients who rece
ived no follow-up to the failed appointment. Interestingly, clients wh
o failed appointments and received no follow-up were much more likely
to need emergency services rather than a regular appointment as their
next contact with the clinic.