E. Merkle et al., THE CLINICAL USE OF MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE MA LE, RoFo. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der neuenbildgebenden Verfahren, 164(1), 1996, pp. 7-12
Purpose: During a period of four years 104 mammograms were performed i
n 89 men. Mastectomies were carried out on 23 men (group 1). 66 patien
ts (group 2) were followed up clinically and in 15 patients serial mam
mograms were obtained. Material and method: In group 1 there were 5 pa
tients with bilateral gynaecomastia, 9 with unilateral gynaecomastia a
nd two with pseudogynaecomastia and there were 7 patients with maligna
ncies. In group 2 there were 46 patients with bilateral gynaecomastia
and 10 patients with unilateral gynaecomastia. Pseudogynaecomastia was
found in 25 patients. There were 7 malignancies, of which 5 had been
suspected clinically and one had been diagnosed as gynaecomastia by ma
mmography. Two carcinomas in situ were missed clinically and also by m
ammography. Conclusion: When malignancy is not suspected on clinical g
rounds the first examination should be sonography, mammography being r
eserved for Gases of doubt. Where, however, malignancy is suspected, a
nd for follow-up, mammography retains its primary position.