PREDICTIVE POWER OF INCREASED HEART-RATE VERSUS DEPRESSED LEFT-VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION AND HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY FOR RISK STRATIFICATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - RESULTS OF A 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY
X. Copie et al., PREDICTIVE POWER OF INCREASED HEART-RATE VERSUS DEPRESSED LEFT-VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION AND HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY FOR RISK STRATIFICATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - RESULTS OF A 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 27(2), 1996, pp. 270-276
Objectives. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value
of mean RR interval assessed from predischarge Holter recordings with
that of heart rate variability and left ventricular ejection fraction
for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Background. Heart
rate variability is a powerful tool for risk stratification after myo
cardial infarction, Although heart rate variability is related to hear
t rate, little is known of the prognostic value of 24-h mean heart rat
e. Methods, A total of 579 patients surviving the acute phase of myoca
rdial infarction were followed up for at least 2 years, Pre discharge
heart rate variability, 24 h mean RR interval and left ventricular eje
ction fraction were analyzed. Results, During the first 2 gears of fol
low-up, there were 54 deaths, 42 of which were cardiac (26 sudden), Sh
orter mean RR interval was a better predictor of all-cause mortality a
s well as cardiac and sudden death than depressed left ventricular eje
ction fraction, Depressed heart rate variability predicted the risk of
death better than mean RR interval for sensitivities < 40%. For sensi
tivities greater than or equal to 40%, mean RR interval was as powerfu
l as heart rate variability, All three variables performed equally wel
l in predicting nonsudden cardiac death, For cardiac death prediction,
a left ventricular ejection fraction <35% had a 40% sensitivity, 78%
specificity and 14% positive predictive accuracy; a mean RR interval <
700 ms had a 45% sensitivity, 85% specificity and 20% positive predict
ive accuracy; and a heart rate variability <17 U had a 40% sensitivity
, 86% specificity and 20% positive predictive accuracy. Conclusions. P
redischarge 24-h mean heart rate is a strong predictor of mortality af
ter myocardial infarction that can compete with left ventricular eject
ion fraction and heart rate variability.