OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF ANNUAL CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT VOLUME

Citation
Re. Clark et al., OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF ANNUAL CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT VOLUME, The Annals of thoracic surgery, 61(1), 1996, pp. 21-26
Citations number
3
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
00034975
Volume
61
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
21 - 26
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4975(1996)61:1<21:OAAFOA>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Background. Recent changes in health care financing have raised the sp ecter of operation-specific, volume credentialing for cardiac surgeons . To meet this challenge, the leadership of The Society of Thoracic Su rgeons formed an Ad Hoc Committee to study the question of the relatio nship of case volume to outcome. One product of the committee's work i s this analysis of data from The Society of Thoracic Surgery National Cardiac Database. Methods. We examined data for all types of coronary artery bypass graft-only operations (n = 124,793) from more than 1,200 surgeons working in more than 600 hospitals for the years 1991 throug h 1993. All in-hospital and 30-day out-of-hospital mortality, both obs erved and expected as predicted by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons ri sk stratification method, was plotted against annualized group practic e volume. Both patient-based and practice-based sampling techniques we re used. Results. The data show that observed mortality ranged from 2. 0% to 3.6% for practices of more than 100 cases through practices with more than 900 cases per year. Those practices with less than 100 case s (n = 18) had a mean mortality of 5%. Expected mortalities ranged fro m 2.4% to 3.9% and did not vary as a function of volume. No practice v olume category had an observed/expected ratio of less than 0.8 and non e had a ratio greater than 1.2, if annual volume was more than 100. Pr actices of less than 100 cases/year had an observed/expected ratio of 1.6% to 1.7%. There was great variation in observed and expected morta lities in the lower volume categories and less variation when volume w as greater (more than 600 cases/year). Conclusions. Although the data are practice-group-specific only, there was no clinically relevant cor relation of volume to outcome except at extremely low annual volume (l ess than 100 cases per year). Variability of outcome was significant i n lower volume practices (less than 600 cases/year) and varied little at more than 600 cases per year. There were no differences in expected mortality regardless of the size of the practice.