P. Colonnaromano et al., EPINEPHRINE-INDUCED TACHYCARDIA IS DIFFERENT FROM CONTRACTION-ASSOCIATED TACHYCARDIA IN LABORING PATIENTS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 82(2), 1996, pp. 294-296
Maternal tachycardic responses to the intravenous injection of epineph
rine 15 mu g were compared with tachycardic responses induced by the p
ain of labor in a double-blind, prospective study of 15 women in activ
e labor. After placement of an epidural catheter, maternal heart rate
was continuously recorded. Each patient received, in uterine diastole,
two injections of a test dose (epinephrine 15 mu g + lidocaine 45 mg)
at 2-4 min intervals, once via the epidural catheter and once intrave
nously in a random fashion. From the maternal heart rate strips, the a
cceleratory phase (bpm) of epinephrine-induced tachycardic responses (
EITRs) and contraction-associated tachycardic responses (CATRs) were c
alculated. The upper bound of the 99% confidence interval (CI) to disc
riminate between the two groups was estimated. The acceleratory phase
of EITRs was 1.85 +/- 0.61 bpm. The acceleratory phase of CATRs was 0.
69 +/- 0.49 (P < 0.0003). The upper bound of the 99% CI was 1.17 bpm.
Using this value to discriminate between EITRs and CATRs, all EITRs wo
uld be correctly identified. We conclude that on-line analysis of mate
rnal tachycardic responses might be used in laboring women to discrimi
nate between EITRs and CATRs and further improve the accuracy of an ep
inephrine test dose during the performance of epidural analgesia.