Jf. Favarelgarrigues et al., HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF SPINAL-ANESTHESIA IN THE ELDERLY - SINGLE-DOSEVERSUS TITRATION THROUGH A CATHETER, Anesthesia and analgesia, 82(2), 1996, pp. 312-316
Sixty elderly patients (> 70 yr old) undergoing surgery for hip fractu
re were prospectively studied in order to compare hemodynamic toleranc
e of titrated doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine using continuous spinal
anesthesia (CSA) versus single-dose spinal anesthesia (SDSA). Patients
were randomized into two groups (CSA group: n = 30; SDSA group: n = 3
0). The SDSA patients received 10-15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine
(based on age and height), and the CSA patients received a starting d
ose of 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, followed after 15 min by o
ptional reinjection of 2.5 mg every 5 min until a T10 level sensory bl
ock was reached. Onset of anesthesia, noninvasive hemodynamic variable
s and the need for ephedrine were studied for 4 h after induction of a
nesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was successful in all patients. Decreases
in mean arterial pressure were significantly less frequent and less p
ronounced in the CSA group (19.9% +/- 1.6% of the baseline value) than
in the SDSA group (40.2% +/- 1.9%, P < 0.0001). The mean dose of ephe
drine was significantly less in the CSA group (1.8 +/- 0.7 mg, adminis
tered to only 37% of patients) than in the SDSA group (19.4 +/- 3.3 mg
administered to all patients, P < 0.0001). No late complications rela
ted to the spinal anesthesia technique were observed in either group.
We concluded that CSA, using small titrated doses of 0.5% hyperbaric b
upivacaine, is safe, efficient, and provides better hemodynamic stabil
ity than SDSA in elderly patients.