Medical intervention commonly addresses issues which can rarely be con
trolled and measured experimentally. The zeal for standardization of t
he intervention may lead to premature closure of a development process
, in which the intervention method and its implementation are omitted
from systematic evaluation. However, evaluation strategies other than
the experimental ones do exist and can overcome these limitations. Act
ion research is presented as an alternative approach for evaluation of
medical interventions. This strategy denotes the study of a social si
tuation, intended to improve the quality of action. The two central co
ncerns-improvements in practice and increased knowledge and understand
ing-are linked together in an integrated and dynamic cycle of activiti
es, in which each phase learns from the previous one and in turn shape
s the next. The stages of research involve problem identification, pla
nning, action and evaluation. A model for medical action research, int
ended to facilitate evaluation of every step, is presented and discuss
ed, illustrated by an example from primary health care research. Evalu
ation must account for the following elements of the process: problem
identification, summarizing previous experience, determining the aims
of intervention, planning and development of the intervention method,
design and articulation of the intervention strategy, implementation o
f action, and redefining the problem. Potentials and limitations of th
e action research strategy are discussed.