EFFECTS OF DOPAMINERGIC D3-RECEPTOR-PREFERRING LIGANDS ON THE ACQUISITION OF PLACE CONDITIONING IN RATS

Citation
F. Chaperon et Mh. Thiebot, EFFECTS OF DOPAMINERGIC D3-RECEPTOR-PREFERRING LIGANDS ON THE ACQUISITION OF PLACE CONDITIONING IN RATS, Behavioural pharmacology, 7(1), 1996, pp. 105-109
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Neurosciences,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Neurosciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
09558810
Volume
7
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
105 - 109
Database
ISI
SICI code
0955-8810(1996)7:1<105:EODDLO>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The involvement of a D3 receptor-mediated control of dopamine (DA) fun ction in motivational processes was investigated in rats by examining the ability of two D3 receptor-preferring ligands (7-OH-DPAT and l-naf adotride) to establish incentive learning and/or to modulate the reinf orcing properties of food. This was done using a place conditioning pr ocedure which consisted of repeated pairings of a drug (or food + drug ) with a single environmental cue, the door texture of an open field. (+/-)7-OH-DPAT, a partially selective D3 receptor agonist, produced a biphasic effect: the time spent on the drug-paired texture was reduced by 4 and 8 mu g/kg and lengthened by 4.0 mg/kg, suggesting intrinsic aversive and appetitive potentials, depending on the dose. The D3 rece ptor preferring antagonist, l-nafadotride, did not establish place con ditioning and seemed therefore devoid of intrinsic reinforcing propert ies. However, when food was provided during the conditioning sessions preceded by drug administration, a low dose of l-nafadotride (0.12 mg/ kg) but not higher doses, lengthened the time spent on the food-paired texture. Although the preferential affinity ratio of the two ligands in favour of the D3 vs. D2 subtype is low, these results suggest that DA function in the structures involved in incentive learning could be controlled through inhibitory D3 (or 'D2-like') receptor-mediated proc esses. Conditioned place aversion would indicate an impaired DA transm ission due to a selective stimulation of these receptors, whereas thei r selective blockade would induce the inverse effect, providing that D A release was sufficient (as during eating) in the pathways involved i n reward-related processes. The reversal of the effects of the two com pounds at larger doses would likely result from an interaction with ot her subtypes of 'D2-like' receptors.