Cd. Economos et al., A MULTICENTER COMPARISON OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETERS - IN-VIVO AND IN-VITRO MEASUREMENTS OF BONE-MINERAL CONTENT AND DENSITY, Journal of bone and mineral research, 11(2), 1996, pp. 275-285
As part of a multicenter research project, we compared dual-energy X-r
ay absorptiometry (CXA) instruments at three research centers (sites 1
, 2, and 3) to determine both intra- and intersite variability of bone
mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and bone area (BA)
, Scans of the total body and lumbar spine were performed in duplicate
on five humans (in vivo), and scans of the total body were performed
on two whole body phantoms with artificial skeletons and thickness ove
rlays (in vitro) at all sites over 15 days, The average intrasite vari
ability in two consecutive total body BMD measurements, expressed as a
percent difference, was significantly higher in vitro) 1.74 +/- 1.97%
, than in vivo, 0.71 +/- 038% (p < 0.05), Average intrasite variabilit
y of the in vivo lumbar spine BMD was 1.08 +/- 1.12%, The intersite co
efficients of variation for all BMD, BMC, and BA measurements were < 2
.0%. The total body BMD from site 2 was systematically lower than at s
ites 1 and 3 both in vivo and in vitro (p < 0.05) with no differences
in BMC and Bk Although significant, the total body BMD differences bet
ween sites were small (< 1.2%) in vivo compared with in vitro (< 2.6%)
and are encouraging for the comparison and pooling of human data from
multicenter trials, provided that appropriate standardized cross-cali
bration and analysis procedures are applied.