Sb. Domel et al., A MEASURE OF STAGES OF CHANGE IN FRUIT AND VEGETABLE CONSUMPTION AMONG FOURTH-GRADE AND FIFTH-GRADE SCHOOL-CHILDREN - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY, Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 15(1), 1996, pp. 56-64
Objective: We developed, pilot-tested, and field-applied a stages of c
hange questionnaire regarding fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption am
ong fourth- and fifth-grade students. Methods: The design included cro
ss-sectional assessment of internal consistency and construct validity
, and 2-week and 7-week longitudinal assessment of test-retest reliabi
lity. Subjects included 134 students from one school for pilot-testing
and 252 from two schools for field application. Thirty-two questions
from McConnaughy et al's stages of change questionnaire were adapted a
nd pilot-tested; minor revisions were made for field application. Stat
istical analyses included principal components analysis to identify su
bscales; cluster analysis to identify subgroups within students; Cronb
ach's alpha coefficient to assess internal consistencies; Pearson prod
uct-moment correlations to assess test-retest reliabilities; and onewa
y ANOVA's by F&V stages of change clusters with actual F&V consumption
, F&V self-efficacy subscales, F&V preferences, and F&V outcome expect
ations subscales to determine construct validity. Results: Principal c
omponents analysis from the field application indicated two subscales
(precontemplation and beyond precontemplation) accounting for 39.5% of
variance. Cluster analysis indicated 6 interpretable clusters; 2 (n =
63) provided responses inconsistent with the stages of change theory
and 4 (n = 189) provided responses consistent with the theory. interna
l consistencies and test-retest reliabilities were acceptable. Student
s in the ''beyond precontemplation'' clusters had higher levels of sel
f-efficacy and outcome expectations regarding eating F&V. Conclusions:
Measuring stages of change other than the precontemplation stage in F
&V consumption among elementary school children is problematic. Perhap
s the theoretical concept does not apply to children, or elementary sc
hool children lack the ability to comprehend the questions measuring t
he concept, or the approach used was nor entirely appropriate.