Jm. Groh et Dl. Sparks, SACCADES TO SOMATOSENSORY TARGETS .2. MOTOR CONVERGENCE IN PRIMATE SUPERIOR COLLICULUS, Journal of neurophysiology, 75(1), 1996, pp. 428-438
1. We examined cells with saccade-related activity in the superior col
liculus (SC) of monkeys performing saccades to both somatosensory and
visual targets. Our goals were 1) to determine whether signals from th
ese separate sensory systems have converged onto a common motor pathwa
y by the level of the SC; 2) to determine the frame of reference of so
matosensory saccade signals in the SC; and 3) to relate collicular mot
or activity to the behavioral characteristics of somatosensory saccade
s. 2. Somatosensory targets consisted of vibrotactile stimuli delivere
d to the hands, which were held in fixed spatial positions. Saccades o
f different directions and amplitudes were elicited from different ini
tial eye positions. Of 86 cells with motor-related activity, 85 (99%)
discharged for saccades to both visual and somatosensory targets. The
remaining cell was active only for visual saccades. 3. Cells with sacc
ade-related activity had movement fields representing the direction an
d amplitude of saccades to both visual and somatosensory targets. We f
ound no cells that discharged for saccades to a particular somatosenso
ry target regardless of the vector of the saccade. 4. Small modality-d
ependent differences in the spatial tuning of the movement fields were
observed, but these variations formed no clear pattern. Given the lar
ge population of cells active in conjunction with each saccade, these
small tuning differences may have no net effect. Because the visual an
d somatosensory movement fields of individual cells were similar to ea
ch other, the inaccuracy of somatosensory saccades is likely to be the
result of inaccurate signals reaching the SC, rather than an error si
gnal added downstream. 5. The peak discharge frequency of collicular m
otor cells was lower for somatosensory saccades than for visual saccad
es, although the number of spikes in the discharge was about the same.
6. The latency of the onset of the prelude of motor activity followin
g the cue to initiate a saccade was about the same for somatosensory a
nd visual trials, even though somatosensory saccades have longer react
ion times than visual saccades, However, the peak of the motor activit
y was delayed on somatosensory trials such that the timing of the peak
was the same with respect to the movement on somatosensory and visual
trials. 7. We conclude that the same population of saccade-related ne
urons in the SC that represents saccades to visual targets also repres
ents saccades to somatosensory targets. Somatosensory saccades are enc
oded by these cells as the change in eye position necessary to bring t
he target onto the fovea, rather than the location of the stimulus on
the body surface. Modality-dependent differences in the frequency and
timing of collicular motor activity may contribute to velocity and rea
ction time differences.