M. Abdulatif et al., EDROPHONIUM ANTAGONISM OF INTENSE MIVACURIUM-INDUCED NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCK IN CHILDREN, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 76(2), 1996, pp. 239-244
We have studied the time course of recovery after administration of ed
rophonium during intense mivacurium block in children aged 2-10 yr, us
ing thumb acceleration in response to train-of-four (TOF) stimulation.
Forty-three children receiving alfentanil, propofol, nitrous oxide, i
soflurane anaesthesia and mivacurium 0.2 mg kg(-1) were allocated rand
omly to one of three groups. Patients in group 1 (n = 15) received edr
ophonium 1 mg kg(-1), 2 min after maximum block (intense block group).
At the time of administration of edrophonium in this group, there was
no response to TOF stimulation (100% block) and the post-tetanic coun
t was 10.7 (range 0-20). Patients in group 2 received the same dose of
edrophonium after 10% recovery of the first twitch (T1) in the TOF (c
onventional reversal). Patients in group 3 (n = 13) recovered spontane
ously. All patients developed complete suppression of twitch height in
response to the bolus dose of mivacurium. All recovery times were mea
sured from the point of maximum block after mivacurium. Mean time for
25% recovery of T1 (clinical duration) was 3.8 (SD 1.1) min in the int
ense block group. This was significantly shorter than the conventional
reversal (8.3 (2.4) min) and spontaneous recovery (9.2 (3.5) min) gro
ups (P < 0.001). The times for 75% and 90% recovery of T1 were shorter
in the intense block group (9.4 (2.8), 12.3 (4.2) min) compared with
the conventional (13.1 (3.8), 17.3 (4.8) min) and spontaneous recovery
(14.9 (4.5), 17.9 (5.2) min) groups (P < 0.01). Total recovery time r
equired for 70% recovery of the TOF ratio (T4/T1) was 8.8 (2.4) min in
the intense block group. This was significantly shorter than the conv
entional reversal (11.9 (3.2) min) and spontaneous recovery (17.1 grou
ps (P < 0.001). Conventional reversal was associated with a shorter to
tal recovery time compared with spontaneous recovery (P < 0.01). The r
ecovery index (time interval between T1 25% and 75%) was comparable in
groups 1-3 (5.5 (2.0), 4.8 (2.1) and 5.7 (1.4) min respectively). Ten
minutes after development of maximum block, the numbers of patients w
ho recovered adequately (TOF ratio 70% or more) were, respectively, 12
(80%), 8 (53%) and 1 (8%) in groups 1-3. We conclude that edrophonium
antagonized intense (no response to TOF stimulation) mivacurium-induc
ed block in children, with significant reduction in the recovery times
of T1 and TOF ratio compared with conventional reversal and spontaneo
us recovery.