COMPARISON OF THE PROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF RECOMBINANT PSEUDORABIES VIRUSES AGAINST PSEUDORABIES AND CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER IN PIGS - INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT PROMOTERS ON GENE-EXPRESSION AND ON PROTECTION
Bjl. Vaniddekinge et al., COMPARISON OF THE PROTECTIVE EFFICACY OF RECOMBINANT PSEUDORABIES VIRUSES AGAINST PSEUDORABIES AND CLASSICAL SWINE FEVER IN PIGS - INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT PROMOTERS ON GENE-EXPRESSION AND ON PROTECTION, Vaccine, 14(1), 1996, pp. 6-12
The glycoprotein E (gE) locus in the genome of pseudorabies virus (PRV
) was used as an insertion site for the expression of glycoprotein El
of classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Transcription of E1 in the reco
mbinants M401, M402 or M403 was regulated by the go promoter of PRV, t
he immediate early gene promoter of human cytomegalovirus, or the gE p
romoter of PRV, respectively Groups of four pigs were vaccinated once
intramuscularly with 10(6) plaque forming units (p.f.u.) Of the recomb
inant viruses and challenged intranasally with 100 50% lethal doses of
virulent CSFV and with 10(5) p.f.u. of virulent PRV. All pigs vaccina
ted with M402 were fully protected against both classical swine fever
and pseudorabies.