Mj. Crawford et al., 2 ISOFORMS OF XENOPUS RETINOIC ACID RECEPTOR GAMMA-2(B) EXHIBIT DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION AND SENSITIVITY TO RETINOIC ACID DURING EMBRYOGENESIS, Developmental genetics, 17(4), 1995, pp. 291-302
We report the isolation of two retinoic acid receptor isoforms (RAR ga
mma), which differ only in the 5' untranslated and putative N-terminus
A regions. The two isoforms appear to serve as early markers for the
presumptive neural axis; however, their expression patterns differ. RA
R-gamma 2.1 is first expressed at gastrulation at the dorsal lip and s
ubsequently along the presumptive neural axis. RAR-gamma 2.2 represent
s the full-length sequence of a receptor cDNA already partially charac
terized and present as a maternal transcript [Ellinger-Ziegelbauer and
Dreyer (1991); Genes Dev 5:94-104, (1993): Mech Dev 41:31-46; Pfeffer
and DeRobertis, (1994) Mech Dev: 45:147-153]. Unlike RAR-gamma 2.2, t
he 2.1 variant is not expressed either in pre-semitic mesoderm or noto
chord. RAR-gamma 2.1 is strongly expressed in branchial arches and to
a lesser extent in the neural floor plate. The two isoforms also exhib
it differential sensitivity to retinoic acid. Constitutive expression
of RAR-gamma 2.2 following neurulation appears to be depressed by trea
tment with retinoic acid, but domains of highest expression, namely, t
he head and tail, remain relatively unaffected, as do patterns of expr
ession prior to late neurulation. By contrast, RAR-gamma 2.1 is not tr
anscribed in retinoid-inhibited structures. Using microinjection techn
iques, we show that changes of RAR-gamma 2.1 expression in presumptive
head structures occur as an early and local consequence of retinoic a
cid administration. Since RAR-gamma 2.1 expression is inhibited by ret
inoic acid, we tested to see if other treatments that perturb axis for
mation had any effect. Surprisingly, UV irradiation did not suppress e
xpression of the RAR-gamma 2.1 transcript, suggesting that its inhibit
ion by retinoic acid is not due solely to inhibition of anterior neura
l development. These experiments demonstrate a new subdivision of isof
orms that undergo differential expression during development and that
exhibit differential sensitivity to retinoic acid and to UV. This sens
itivity and the presence of this isoform variant in regions that are k
nown to exhibit polarizing activity strengthen the hypothesis that the
se receptors play a primary role during morphogenesis. (C) 1995 Wiley-
Liss, Inc.