Background A favourable benefit/risk ratio for treatment of rheumatoid
arthritis (RA) with second-line drugs has been established only in sh
ort-term studies, The present investigation addresses the question of
whether RA patients with a good response to long-term treatment with s
econd-line drugs benefit from continuation of such treatment. Methods
A 52-week randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre study
was conducted to assess the effect of stopping second-line therapy in
285 RA patients with a good long-term therapeutic response, The patie
nts either continued the second-line drug (n=142) or received a placeb
o (n=143). The endpoint was a flare, defined as recurrence of synoviti
s. Findings At entry into the study median duration of second-line dru
g therapy was 5 years (range 2-33). At 52 weeks the cumulative inciden
ce of a flare was 38% for the placebo group and 22% for the continued
therapy group (p=0.002). The risk of a flare was 2.0 times higher for
patients receiving placebo than for those continuing the second-line d
rug (95% CI 1.27 to 3.17). The same trend was found for each second-li
ne drug separately, with the exception of d-penicillamine. Side-effect
s that necessitated dose reduction or discontinuation occurred in 2 pa
tients in each group. Interpretation Second-line drugs continue to be
effective in RA patients who have responded well to initial treatment.