Varietal selection programmes for agricultural and horticultural crops
are generally constructed to achieve one of two main objectives. Thes
e are firstly the selection of a fixed number of varieties in such a w
ay as to achieve a maximum expected mean yield for the selected variet
ies and secondly the selection of sufficient Varieties to achieve some
minimum or expected probability that a specified number of the 'best'
Varieties are among those selected. The two approaches are contrasted
by assuming that the varieties being assessed are a random sample of
varieties whose true yielding capacities are normally distributed. The
approach meeting the second objective gives rise to an unpredictable
number of selected varieties. By choosing the parameters of the select
ion procedure to give an expected number selected equal to the number
selected in the approach for the first objective, comparisons can be m
ade. Our paper shows that, with the normal distribution assumption, th
e approaches give approximately the same expected probability of selec
ting one of the best varieties as well as approximately the same expec
ted gains in yield. The approach for the first objective is favoured b
ecause of the practical advantages of selecting a predefined number of
varieties. The advantages of maximizing expected mean yield over achi
eving stated probabilities of correct selection are stressed. Also con
sidered in this paper is the optimal number of varieties to carry forw
ard to a final stage of selection so that the probability that the bes
t variety statistically significantly outyields a control variety in t
he final stage is maximized.