M. Espigares et al., ASSAYS FOR THE TERTIARY BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF WASTE-WATER USING AUTOTROPHIC BIOMASS, Environmental toxicology and water quality, 11(1), 1996, pp. 37-44
The conventional tertiary treatments for wastewater (chemical precipit
ation, ion exchange, or membrane technology) are usually not carried o
ut because of the high cost involved. When organic contamination occur
s in rivers and streams, the polysaprobic zone generally presents a hi
gh bacterial count as well as an absence of plankton and dissolved oxy
gen, whereas the alpha-mesosaprobic zone and, to an even greater exten
t, the beta-mesosaprobic zone, show a decline in the bacterial count a
nd an increase in autotrophic organisms and dissolved oxygen at the ex
pense of the inorganic nutrients. This fact points to the possibility
of developing a tertiary biologic treatment using algal biomass. With
this reasoning, the experimental purification of a secondary effluent
was carried out using multispecies microalgae cultures, and studying t
he evolution of chlorophyll, nitrate, nitrite, ammonium, inorganic nit
rogen, pH, conductivity, chemical oxygen demand (GOD, using the potass
ium permanganate method), hardness, phosphate, chloride, and sulphate.
The assays were done in both aerobiosis and anaerobiosis on a 9-day c
ulture. Evolution was interpreted on the basis of the linear tendency
and the mean values of the overall instantaneous specific rate (ISR) a
nd that of the first three days of culture (ISR(3)). According to the
linear tendency and ISR, the parameters of inorganic nitrogen, conduct
ivity, hardness, and chloride evidence greater purification in the pro
cess in aerobiosis, in which nitrogen fixation, when it occurs, does n
ot take priority over the consumption of inorganic nitrogen, Purificat
ion is clearly favored in conditions of anaerobiosis, however, for amm
onium and phosphate. The results obtained demonstrate the viability of
tertiary biologic sewage treatment using an autotrophic activated slu
dge process. This type of treatment improves the quality of the efflue
nt and increases yield, as the process is continuous and concurs with
biomass recirculation. Although statistically significant differences
were not established for aerobic/anaerobic conditions, a combination o
f the two could increase effectiveness. (C) 1996 by John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.