DO CONSENSUS CONFERENCES INFLUENCE THEIR PARTICIPANTS

Citation
Am. Clarfield et al., DO CONSENSUS CONFERENCES INFLUENCE THEIR PARTICIPANTS, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association journal, 154(3), 1996, pp. 331-336
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
08203946
Volume
154
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
331 - 336
Database
ISI
SICI code
0820-3946(1996)154:3<331:DCCITP>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether participation in a consensus conferenc e on the assessment of dementia would influence conference participant s with respect to their recommendations to primary care physicians for the assessment of dementia. Design: Questionnaire before and after th e conference. Setting: Canadian Consensus Conference on the Assessment of Dementia, held in Montreal, Oct. 5 and 6, 1989. Participants: All 38 experts representing relevant health disciplines who participated i n the consensus conference; 36 completed both questionnaires. Outcome measures: Participants' opinion before and after the conference as to how frequently each of 28 manoeuvres (12 blood tests, 4 neurologic ima ging procedures, 4 types of consultation and 8 ''other'' tests) should be ordered by primary care physicians as part of an assessment of a p atient with dementia suspected on clinical grounds. Results: For 18 (6 4%) of the 28 manoeuvres (10 of the 12 blood tests, 3 of the 4 neurolo gic imaging procedures and 5 of the 8 ''other'' tests), there was a sh ift in opinion after the conference toward recommending that primary c are physicians them less often, for 10 of these 18 (5 blood tests and 5 ''other'' tests) the shift was statistically significant. For the re maining 10 manoeuvres (36%) the shift in opinion was toward a recommen dation that primary care physicians order them more often; the shift w as not statistically significant for any of these 10 manoeuvres. Concl usion: Expert members of a consensus conference are influenced by the process of having participated in such a conference and are capable an d willing to change their initial recommendations when confronted with relevant data.