CHARACTERIZATION OF SQUALENE EPOXIDASE ACTIVITY FROM THE DERMATOPHYTETRICHOPHYTON-RUBRUM AND ITS INHIBITION BY TERBINAFINE AND OTHER ANTIMYCOTIC AGENTS
B. Favre et Ns. Ryder, CHARACTERIZATION OF SQUALENE EPOXIDASE ACTIVITY FROM THE DERMATOPHYTETRICHOPHYTON-RUBRUM AND ITS INHIBITION BY TERBINAFINE AND OTHER ANTIMYCOTIC AGENTS, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 40(2), 1996, pp. 443-447
Squalene epoxidase (SE) is the primary target of the allylamine antimy
cotic agents terbinafine and naftifine and also of the thiocarbamates.
Although all of these drugs are employed primarily in dermatological
therapy, SE from dermatophyte fungi has not been previously investigat
ed. We report here the biochemical characterization of SE activity fro
m Trichophyton rubrum and the effects of terbinafine and other inhibit
ors. Microsomal SE activity from T. rubrum was not dependent on solubl
e cytoplasmic factors but had an absolute requirement for NADPH or NAD
H and was stimulated by flavin adenine dinucleotide. Kinetic analyses
revealed that under optimal conditions the K-m for squalene was 13 mu
M and its V-max was 0.71 nmol/h/mg of protein. Terbinafine was the mos
t potent inhibitor tested, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50)
of 15.8 nM. This inhibition was noncompetitive with regard to the subs
trate squalene. A structure-activity relationship study with some anal
ogs of terbinafine indicated that the tertiary amino structure of terb
inafine was crucial for its high potency, as well as the tert-alkyl si
de chain. Naftifine had a lower potency (IC50, 114.6 nM) than terbinaf
ine. Inhibition was also demonstrated by the thiocarbamates tolciclate
(IC50, 28.0 nM) and tolnaftate (IC50, 51.5 nM). Interestingly, the mo
rpholine amorolfine also displayed a weak but significant effect (IC50
30 mu M). T rubrum SE was only slightly more sensitive (approximately
twofold) to terbinafine inhibition than was the Candida albicans enzy
me. Therefore, this difference cannot fully explain the much higher su
sceptibility (greater than or equal to 100-fold) of dermatophytes than
of yeasts to this drug. The sensitivity to terbinafine of ergosterol
biosynthesis in whole cells of T. rubrum (IC50, 1.5 nM) is 10-fold hig
her than that of SE activity, suggesting that the drug accumulates in
the fungus.