Sd. Mcleod et al., THE ROLE OF SMEARS, CULTURES, AND ANTIBIOTIC-SENSITIVITY TESTING IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SUSPECTED INFECTIOUS KERATITIS, Ophthalmology, 103(1), 1996, pp. 23-28
Purpose: To examine the role of routine smears, cultures, and antibiot
ic sensitivity testing in the treatment of suspected infectious kerati
tis. Methods: A retrospective chart and laboratory data review was per
formed for 81 consecutive patients seen in the Los Angeles County/Univ
ersity of Southern California Department of Ophthalmology between June
1991 and December 1993 with a primary diagnosis of community-acquired
infectious keratitis. No patients were treated with antibiotics befor
e evaluation in the authors' department, and all underwent corneal scr
apings for gram-stain and bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterium culture
s. Ulcers were classified as moderate or severe. All initially were tr
eated as inpatients with a regimen including fortified cefazolin and a
fortified aminoglycoside. Results: Of 81 patients, 74 ulcers were eit
her culture- negative (n = 18) or grew bacteria (n = 56). Fungal infec
tion was suggested in seven patients. Of the nonfungal ulcers, 33 were
classified as moderate, and 41 as severe; all moderate ulcers improve
d without requiring a modification in antibiotic treatment, whereas 3
severe ulcers required a change in treatment. Conclusion: Most communi
ty-acquired bacterial ulcers resolve with broad spectrum empiric thera
py. Alternatives to universal culture and sensitivity testing that mig
ht be considered include selectively performing cultures for more seve
re or suspected non-bacterial ulcers or routinely obtaining cultures i
n all cases, but pursuing identification and sensitivity studies only
when those data are required for therapy modification.